The questions I’m answering in this blog post are related to the article “What’s a Business For?” written by Charles Handy
Based on what you read in the first two pages (pages 3 and
4), why are virtue and integrity so vital to an economy?
Companies underestimate how much the consumer depends on
being able to trust companies. “Markets rely on rules and laws, but those rules
and laws in turn depend on truth and trust. Conceal truth or erode trust, and
the game becomes so unreliable that no one will want to play.” Consumers rely heavily
on companies. They are not able to make for themselves everything they need,
the things they can get at the store. Or they may not have the time or means to
make things for themselves. But does this mean that companies can just
willy-nilly take advantage of consumers? I don’t believe so. Companies should
have the mindset of virtue and integrity, not just how much money they can
make. I believe companies could have a great influence on our nation if they
focused more on how they can better help the consumer instead of just getting
his money.
According to Charles Handy, what is the “real justification”
for the existence of businesses?
According to Charles Handy, the “real justification” for
business is for a business to make a profit and use that profit to do something
more or better.
What are two solutions proposed by Handy that you agree
with? Why?
I agree with the solution of workweeks that have less than
40 hours, “long work is not necessarily good work…” The job my husband had before
his current one, the work 40 hours but it was in 4 days, not 5. Now, the days
where he worked for 10 hours was hard, but I loved having a three-day weekend
every weekend. We had more time as a family, taking care of the home, and then
time for worship. He found more relief having that extra day each week. I
believe having the workweek cut down to 32 hours and 4 days would give everyone
that relief in having more time for their other responsibilities and motivate
them to use those 32 hours more wisely.
I also agree that employees should be paid some from the
dividends and not just the shareholders. There would be no dividends if it
weren’t for the employees; because they are the ones that make the company.
Their skills, their duties, their manual labor are what make the company keep
running, so the company to make any profit. Of course, a company needs shareholders and
employees, but oftentimes both positions are not treated the same. “It seems
only fair that dividends be paid to those who contribute their skills as well
as to those who have contributed their money.”
Comments
Post a Comment