Skip to main content

Q&A for "What's a Business For?" by Charles Handy

 The questions I’m answering in this blog post are related to the article “What’s a Business For?” written by Charles Handy

Based on what you read in the first two pages (pages 3 and 4), why are virtue and integrity so vital to an economy?

Companies underestimate how much the consumer depends on being able to trust companies. “Markets rely on rules and laws, but those rules and laws in turn depend on truth and trust. Conceal truth or erode trust, and the game becomes so unreliable that no one will want to play.” Consumers rely heavily on companies. They are not able to make for themselves everything they need, the things they can get at the store. Or they may not have the time or means to make things for themselves. But does this mean that companies can just willy-nilly take advantage of consumers? I don’t believe so. Companies should have the mindset of virtue and integrity, not just how much money they can make. I believe companies could have a great influence on our nation if they focused more on how they can better help the consumer instead of just getting his money.

According to Charles Handy, what is the “real justification” for the existence of businesses?

According to Charles Handy, the “real justification” for business is for a business to make a profit and use that profit to do something more or better.

What are two solutions proposed by Handy that you agree with? Why?

I agree with the solution of workweeks that have less than 40 hours, “long work is not necessarily good work…” The job my husband had before his current one, the work 40 hours but it was in 4 days, not 5. Now, the days where he worked for 10 hours was hard, but I loved having a three-day weekend every weekend. We had more time as a family, taking care of the home, and then time for worship. He found more relief having that extra day each week. I believe having the workweek cut down to 32 hours and 4 days would give everyone that relief in having more time for their other responsibilities and motivate them to use those 32 hours more wisely.

I also agree that employees should be paid some from the dividends and not just the shareholders. There would be no dividends if it weren’t for the employees; because they are the ones that make the company. Their skills, their duties, their manual labor are what make the company keep running, so the company to make any profit.  Of course, a company needs shareholders and employees, but oftentimes both positions are not treated the same. “It seems only fair that dividends be paid to those who contribute their skills as well as to those who have contributed their money.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

W05 Boundaries and Money

 This week I studied setting boundaries and money management skills. These skills are very important skills to have in a marriage.  I have a fear-based relationship with money because I don't understand how to manage it. Recently, I have been feeling a pull to understand money management. Tyler and I have been meeting with a financial advisor and it has really opened our eyes to all of the opportunities we have to take control of our finances. It has been a very encouraging experience. I feel less scared with more knowledge and I feel like I have more control. Tyler and I also talked about boundaries in our marriage, specifically setting an appropriate boundary between our marriage and parenthood. Some of the points that were brought up in class, we felt like we had set an appropriate boundary. There was one point that we both felt like we could make and that was planning a specific time for our marriage.  You can call us crazy, but Tyler and I are not huge fans of the tr...

Handful of Meal, A Little Oil

 "So he arose and went to Zarephath. And when he came to the gate of the city, behold, the widow woman was there gathering of sticks: and he called to her, and said Fetch me, I pray thee, a little water in a vessel, that I may drink. And as she was going to fetch it, he called to her, and said, Bring me, I pray thee, a morsel of bread in thine hand. And she said, As the Lord thy God liveth, I have not a cake, but an handful of meal in a barrel, and a little oil in a cruse: and, behold, I am gathering two sticks, that I may go in and dress it for me and my son, that we may eat it, and die. And Elijah said unto her, Fear not; go and do as thou hast said: but make me thereof a little cake first, and bring it unto me, and after make for thee and for thy son.  For thus saith the Lord God of Israel, The barrel of meal shall not waste, neither shall the cruse of oil fail, until the day that the Lord sendeth rain upon the earth. And she went and did according to the saying of Elijah: ...

Sacrifice

Numbers 7, the tabernacle is being dedicated. Each leader from the 12 tribes brings an offering. If I read the chapter correctly each tribe brings the same offering, or close to the same offering. That is what the entire chapter is, talking about the offering that each tribe brought - the exact same offering. By the 3rd offering, I was starting to get annoyed. Sorry. But by the 7th offering I was wondering why this was significant. Each tribe brought offerings for the different sacrifices performed in the tabernacle.  Why were each of these sacrifices so important that each tribe brought offerings for each one? After this weeks reading, particularly this chapter, my mind has been on sacrifice and the importance of the sacrifices performed in the tabernacle. I do feel like my understanding is expanding, but it isn't fully cooked. So, I will share the thoughts and connections that I found this week.  First, I noticed all the different kinds of sacrifices and offerings made in th...